Routine work on premium models
Classification, extraction, summaries, and first drafts may need a fraction of the capability being purchased.
AI cost optimization
Most AI stacks were assembled one decision at a time: one provider, the most capable model, another subscription, and a new feature inside existing software.
We audit the whole operation and turn that scattered spend into a plan ranked by savings, effort, and risk.
Book a cost auditWe track changes in models, pricing, and platforms closely, while testing every option against your actual workload.
Delivered in 2 to 3 weeks / written roadmap ranked in dollars
Where money leaks
We look for defaults that stopped making sense as the market changed or usage grew.
Classification, extraction, summaries, and first drafts may need a fraction of the capability being purchased.
Providers do not deliver the same performance or price for code, long documents, and simple high-volume calls.
Unused seats and duplicate tools hide spend outside the API invoice.
Repeated context, excessive retrieval, and no caching or batching turn engineering debt into a monthly cost.
Without cost per feature, team, or workflow, every optimization conversation begins as a guess.
Coverage
Every recommendation identifies expected savings, technical effort, risk, and how to verify that quality holds.
Workload fit, alternatives, and negotiating position.
Required capability tested against real tasks.
Seats, plans, add-ons, and open alternatives.
Caching, batching, routing, context, and agents.
Attribution, budgets, and operational alerts.
Process
Remote and async-friendly work across any time zone.
Set up attribution with the logs or gateway you already use.
Map workloads, contracts, and tools against cost and required capability.
Rank actions by savings, effort, and risk in a written report.
Apply changes with your team or ours and evaluate real outputs.
Optionally review the stack as models and prices continue to change.
Origin
Our work runs through Copilot, Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, and local models: each where it fits, none of them everywhere.
We build production AI systems and apply the same cost discipline used in Darwin, our construction estimation platform.
Explore Darwin, our construction estimation platform Read: The Right Tool for the Right Job ↗FAQ
Premium models used by default, overlapping subscriptions, inefficient architecture, and poor attribution usually accumulate. The audit separates each cause.
It depends on your current workloads, contracts, and architecture. We establish a baseline and provide a supported figure before proposing implementation.
No. Providers, tools, caching, batching, context, routing, and visibility can matter as much as model selection.
Not necessarily. Many savings come from using current providers better. When another option fits, the change remains contained and reversible.
Every change that could affect results is evaluated against real tasks. If the cheaper option performs worse, it is not implemented.
Yes. The review includes higher tiers, add-ons, and AI features inside software you already use.
First step
A remote audit in English or Spanish, ending in a written roadmap ranked in dollars.
Book a cost audit